| | |  | Timex Women's Ironman T5J151 Grey Polyurethane Quartz Watch with Digital Dial | Home » » » Timex Women's Ironman T5J151 Grey Polyurethane Quartz Watch with Digital Dial | | | | | | Product Promotions: | | | | | Product Details: | | | Product Length:
| 4.0 inches | | Product Width:
| 3.0 inches | | Product Height:
| 3.0 inches | | Product Weight:
| 0.2 pounds | | Package Length:
| 3.54 inches | | Package Width:
| 2.83 inches | | Package Height:
| 2.6 inches | | Package Weight:
| 0.22 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
| based on 347 reviews |
| | | Watch Information: | | | Crystal Material:
| Acrylic | | Clasp:
| Buckle | | Case Diameter:
| 34 millimeters | | Case Thickness:
| 10 millimeters | | Case Material:
| Resin | | Band Material:
| Resin | | Bezel Material:
| Resin | | Dial Color:
| Grey | | Movement:
| Quartz | | Calendar:
| Date | | Water Resistance Depth:
| 165 feet |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
( 347 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
94 of 94 found the following review helpful:
Reliable watch with useful featuresDec 16, 2008
By Amanda Reliable watch has withstood two deployments to Iraq, among other things, and still works great. Date, alarm, indiglo, stopwatch, and dual time zone features have been very useful. Plastic parts aren't colored all the way through and are wearing off on some edges, but that's absolutely acceptable given the wear I've put on it. The face is still clear with no major scratches despite my scraping it against everything. I don't think you can beat the durability and functionality of this watch for the price. 2012 update-- I'm still wearing this watch regularly during workouts and rowing sessions on the water, and it's still running on its original battery. Keeper!
93 of 99 found the following review helpful:
About what you would expectFeb 21, 2011
By Liz Brian This watch is priced cheaply for a reason. I bought two Timex watches to replace my old running watch - this one and a more expensive Timex Ironman, which cost $34. I wanted to see if there was really a difference and there is.
The main issue is the buttons. They are small metal knobs on the side and difficult to push. By the time you have finished setting the watch, your fingers are sore. Fine if you only set the watch once, but if you are buying this for any of the other features, you will be pushing these buttons a lot: every time you use the chrono, timer, or alarm functions. Also, every time you switch between functions.
Also, there is one less button on this watch, the lap button. You are not able to time laps on this watch! So you have set, mode, indiglo and stop/start. The Ironman series has set/RECALL, mode, indiglo, stop/reset and start/split. The start/split button is on the top of the watch, making it easy to use while on a run.
These issues do not make it a bad watch, just not a substitute for a real digital running/timing watch. I will keep it in the drawer as a backup, but I wouldn't order another one.
54 of 59 found the following review helpful:
Good buy for the moneyFeb 11, 2008
By H. Flores I wear this watch almost all the time. I do the dishes, wash my face, take showers, work in the garden, even swim with that watch, and it has not fogged up or scratched. I like the indigo light to check out the time at night. I also like the date setting and the alarm setting. Too many other settings that I haven't figured out yet. The wrist band is very comfortable. I usually don't like the hard bands because they hurt, the soft bands get wet and moldy, others pinch or leave marks. This wrist band is excellent. I wish the watch looked a little bit more dressy to wear to the office, but I don't care, I still wear it with a suit even though I know it looks a little off.
69 of 85 found the following review helpful:
overall good deal but for beginner or intermediate runnersAug 30, 2008
By A. Stewart
"distinct"
This is a a very attractive watch which is definitely a plus. Also, the watch is relatively easy to use. However there a few drawbacks. For example, after thirty minutes, the watch no longer records seconds, only minutes. This unfortunately makes this watch futile unless you are a beginner and are not too concerned with precision. I wouldn't recommend this watch for a serious or experienced runner. ( I am a sprinter that has taken up cross country thus i found this watch served its purpose considering I was running cross country to improve in sprinting events). Another major drawback is the lack of directions with the watch. I mean I understand the watch is only twenty bucks but can I get some fricking directions????!!!
13 of 14 found the following review helpful:
good simple watchNov 03, 2010
By K. Thomas I am a first time marathon runner and run with a group once a week. I bought this watch as a cheap way to keep track of my time when I run on my own during the rest of the week. I saw some reviews that said this did not keep track of the seconds after 30 minutes. This is actually inaccurate, it does keep track of the seconds it just simply moves them from the main display to the top right. It is a little harder to read but definitely manageable so I was pleasantly surprised. I think it is well worth it at this price point if you are looking for something basic. It obviously doesn't keep track of miles, calories or heart rate but for me it works well.
See all 347 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|